Thursday, September 14, 2006

What Gives, ANC?

As media liaison for the Black & White Movement and STOP Cha Cha, one segment of the job is to monitor the news on TV, radio and in print. When it comes to television news, I naturally depend on ANC to give me the lowdown on current events as well as coverage of important news events. ANC does a pretty good job, and their correspondents are competent, they know their stuff. The Black & White Movement and STOP Cha Cha are grateful for ANC's coverage of our events and activities.

So, I thought it was great that ANC was covering the lively Senate hearing on the PCGG this afternoon. But as Sen. Serge Osmena was asking questions of Camilo Sabio, I was surprised when ANC cut its coverage in favor of a lifestyle show, "Shop Talk". Don't get me wrong, I think "Shop Talk" is an informative show. But when it takes precedence over a news event such as a hot topic like the Senate versus the PCGG, that confuses me. Is faux jewelry and ceramic art more important than alleged anomalous dealings by the PCGG?

With all due respect to Maria Ressa, who did answer my text, saying their EP (Executive Producer) was "watching and will go back if it (the hearing) moves", it seems that ANC has re-ordered its priorities when it comes to the coverage of news events. ANC touts its capability of giving us the news as it breaks (Ricky Carandang speaks about that in an ANC ad), as seen in last's year's impeachment hearings in the House (Pinky Webb alludes to it in the same ANC ad, saying that's what "made" them, and that's true), the coverage of last February's events, etc. There is nothing better for anyone interested in the news than breaking news. And I really thought that was ANC's core competence as a news channel, in fact, as the only all-news channel in this country.

The news is important to me. As Maria says in their ad, without ANC we wouldn't be able to get local news as it happens. And I do depend on ANC for this strength, not for its lifestyle programming. But that's just me, and I'm just one viewer.

6 comments:

manuelbuencamino said...

Ressa's answer, "If it moves" is wrong.

If a news channel believes an event is worthy of live coverage then it should do just that - Turn on the camera and let it run from start to finish.

If a news channel believes that something is important but not worthy of live coverage then it should simply air taped portions of those parts it considers relevant or moving. Then it becomes a news report and not live coverage which is "news as it happens".

Ano yun? Why is the ANC acting like a televiewer who switches channels when they are bored?

Helga said...

My thoughts exactly, MB!

Just because the shouting had ceased didn't mean that the rest of the proceedings was less important. It smacks of bad decision making. The statement doesn't seem to be in keeping with their current ad on breaking news.

They're a news channel, not House and Garden.

manuelbuencamino said...

"We interrupt our live news coverage to return to our regularly scheduled program"

"We interrupt our regular programming to bring you a live news event"

ANC sees no difference between the two. They should change their name to ENC. Entertainment and News Channel.

john marzan said...

in ANC's opinion, mas importante ang "shop talk" tv show kaysa sa senate hearing re PCGG?

*scratches head*

Helga said...

John, am happy to report that at this time (around 3:55pm), the hearing's being covered live from Senate, during the time slot of "Shop Talk". :->

RUMMEL PINERA said...

PLEASE REQUEST MR. KOFI ANNAN TO RESIGN GRACEFULLY FROM

HIS POSITION AS SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE U.N. ORGANIZATION!




Dear Progressive Comrades,


I would like to propose to your organization/ state agency the idea that Mr.

Kofi Annan should now voluntarily resign from his current post as U.N. Secretary-

General. I would like to request your state agency/ organization to peacefully and

lawfully appeal to Mr. Kofi Annan to voluntarily resign from being the Secretary-General

of the U.N., and, after resigning from such position, convince his colleagues at the U.N.

headquarters to implement reforms that will truly democratize the whole structure of the

U.N. Organization. I believe that Mr. Annan has done great works for the U.N. Org

as the United Nations' Secretary-General. But his works at the U.N. Org didn't pave

the way for the United Nations' Organization to completely embrace democratic

procedures and processes. So, Mr. Kofi Annan should gracefully resign now from his

position as the U.N. Org's Secretary-General.


I hope that your state agency/ organization will also peacefully and lawfully

call for the democratization of the U.N. Organization. I would also like your state

agency/ organization to support the nomination of Miss Aung San Suu Kyi as the new

Secretary-General of the U.N.. Miss Aung San Suu Kyi is the most eligible person in

this world right now who can replace Mr. Kofi Annan as the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Miss Aung San Suu Kyi's

ascension as the new Secretary-General would give the U.N. Organization's

democratization a better chance to succeed. Miss Aung San Suu Kyi is well-known

all over the world as a dedicated human-rights' campaigner and peaceful pro-democracy leader. I hope that your own state agency/

organization will support these proposals. Our group is called the LEAGUE OF

POLITICAL ABROGATIONISTS or the L.P.A.. Our group is advocating real, global and

moral democracy through peaceful and lawful means. Further details about our group

can be seen at this web page:

http://www.geocities.com/esabon/POLITICAL_ABROGATIONERS.html . Just click

such web page now to enter our web page. I hope that your state agency/ organization

will effectively support the mentioned proposals in this message. Thanks.


Sincerely,


RUMMEL PINERA

Chairman of the LEAGUE OF

POLITICAL ABROGATIONISTS

L.P.A.


rummelp@yahoo.com