Thursday, May 11, 2006

Statements Against Arroyo's Cha Cha Train

It seems that the tide against Gloria Arroyo's version of Charter Change is beginning to grow. The latest sector to join our STOP CHA CHA campaign is business. Apart from the Makati Business Club (staunchly anti Gloria's Charter Change), the Management Association of the Philippines has come out with its statement on the matter. We reprint both for your study and comments:

MAP STATEMENT ON CHARTER CHANGE

The MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION OF THE PHILIPPINES (MAP) supports the complete review of the 1987 Constitution. However, being the fundamental law of the land, any proposed changes to it call for a careful, intelligent, deliberate and credible process.

The MAP, an association of business professionals and executives, believes that People’s Initiative as enshrined in the Constitution must be used in the right manner for the right purpose. As its name implies, such move must originate from the grassroots not from above. Such right given to the people assumes that the constituents are given the opportunity to study and understand the issues, enabling them to make informed choices.

There is no reason to short-cut proper procedures to get the Constitution amended by July 15, 2006 as some politicians have targeted. There is nothing sacred about this date that will justify the hurried manner by which the so-called People’s Initiative is being pushed. Such rush just raises questions about the motivations of the people who espouse this method.

Therefore, let us do what is right for the country by reviewing the Constitution completely. In particular, economic reforms are most important in stimulating growth and so with social and other provisions that must be studied and amended to achieve the stated objective of solving the poverty problem. Hence, let us take this precious opportunity to prioritize the interests of the Filipino people, even if self-sacrifice is called for. The People’s Initiative that is being advocated now is not the means to revise the Constitution.

The MAP thus recommends the establishment of conditions precedent before a serious attempt is made to change the Constitution:

1. A careful and objective study of the present Constitution must be made and the provisions that deter growth must be identified for possible amendment. The selection process to name the framers of the Constitution must assure the electorate that competent and patriotic delegates will emerge from the process.

2. Our people must be informed, educated and enlightened so they can intelligently participate in debates and discussions to achieve acceptance of the process and its outcome.

3. The constitutional changes must not redound to the benefit of the incumbents, particularly those who are involved in the preparation and approval of these revisions. This prohibition should also cover the transitory provisions.

4. The process to change the charter must be fully compliant with the provisions of the present Constitution.

5. The credibility and integrity of the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) must be restored.

The MAP wishes to insure that charter change will create a Constitution that will be a strong and permanent foundation for peace, justice, development and solidarity of our country. The MAP, together with other professional and business associations, calls its members to action to do their part to achieve this task.

May God bless us and our country.


MBC CAUTIONS AGAINST UNDUE HASTE FOR CHA-CHA

The Makati Business Club cautions against the haste and haphazard manner in which the government is pushing for Constitutional amendments. Such a fast-track process, without benefit of enlightened public discussion and debate on the merits of a Constitutional amendment, may have negative effects on the economy. Even the Consultative Commission did not arrive at a consensus and some of the provisions in its report, notably the cancellation of the 2007 elections, were met with public criticism and resistance. A significant number of Commissioners voted against the "no election" provision, while a minority issued dissenting reports against other provisions.

Ironically, while the government originally focused on the economic provisions of the Constitution as a means of promoting economic growth, the current proposal does not even touch on the economy and is exclusively focused on the political provisions of shifting from a presidential to parliamentary system, a resetting of elections, and transitory provisions on political matters. Under these conditions, it is difficult to see how the economy and the people will benefit when no economic provisions are even being discussed.

The current attempt to not only amend but revise the Constitution by people’s initiative has no basis under the Constitution. Article XVII, Sec. 2 clearly and unequivocally states: "The Congress shall provide for the implementation of the exercise of this right." Therefore, without an enabling law passed by Congress, the people cannot exercise "this right," meaning the right to amend the Constitution by people’s initiative. In 1997, the Supreme Court in the case of Santiago vs. Comelec held the Initiative and Referendum Act (R.A 6735) invalid. At the same time, the Supreme Court permanently enjoined the Commission on Elections from entertaining any such petition until a sufficient law has been enacted.

The amendment of the Constitution is a very serious matter, a wholesale change can only be undertaken either through a Constituent Assembly or a Constitutional Commission (Sec. 1, Art. XVII). A change from a Presidential to a Parliamentary form of government involves a major ideological shift from a system of checks and balances between three departments of government to the fusion of the executive and legislative powers in one entity. Surely, a paradigmatic shift of this magnitude cannot be considered a minor amendment. This requires more careful study and public discussion to determine what is in the best interest of the nation economically, socially, and politically. The fact that an amendment is now being rushed with only political provisions in mind does not augur well for the country. If such major decisions are carried out with undue haste, we feel that such rushed decisions will have negative repercussions for the country and its economy.

1 comment:

Juan said...

CBCP’s call for GMA to face the illegitimacy issue entails focus on electoral reforms, which must consider the ff:
1) The present COMELEC is/will be under investigation by the OMBUDSMAN as per SC ruling.
2) Abalos etal will not resign.
3) Preparation for a credible 2007 election must be on going and on-track.
4) Forming a new Commission, at this point, has become a must priority.

Recommended is a bullet amendment that would:
1) Abolish the present COMELEC to form a new body,
2) Change the process of appointments to the commission,
3) Remove from COMELEC jurisdiction over election protests,

In preparation for 2007 election, the people must take the initiative:
1) Petition your congressional representatives to support the “Change the COMELEC Amendment",
2) warn your congressional representative that his stand on this amendment and the impeachment will be the bases of your vote in the 2007 election,
3) Draft and support alternative candidates to replace unresponsive and irresponsible congressional representatives,

A PEOPLE’S RESOLUTION Calling upon Congress to pass an amendment replacing the present COMELEC with a new Commission:
WHEREAS, we, the people, have totally lost the trust and confidence on the present members of the Commission on Elections; and,
WHEREAS, we, the people, desire and demand that electoral reforms be undertaken by a new set of Commissioners; and,
WHEREAS, we, the people hold dear our rights and shall protect our votes; therefore be it
RESOLVED, that, we, the people, in whom sovereign power resides, calls upon Congress to pass an amendment that would replace the COMELEC with a new Commission.