I Case You Missed It - Like Father, like Son? by Yoly Ong

Citizen Y 106      10-16-12      Yoly Villanueva-Ong

Like Father, like Son?

Just when we were about to forgive-and-forget Juan Ponce Enrile’s checkered past, he himself reminded us of what a wily, shifty chameleon he truly and naturally is. His stellar performance at the Corona impeachment leveraged enough glory for his son and namesake to become a strong contender for the Senate. Then he launches his autobiography and bio-documentary that attempt to revise history.It’s almost as if he can’t help but shoot his own foot.

And as history and some unassailable sources avow, this would not be the first time Enrile “shot himself’. In Juan Ponce Enrile: A Memoir, and bio-documentary “Johnny” that aired in ABS-CBN--- he recants his previous recantation of the assassination attempt on him, which Marcos used as one more reason to justify Martial Law.

“This accusation is ridiculous and preposterous. What would I have faked my ambush for?” By that time martial law was already an “irreversible fact” since documents had been signed and the military operation to implement it had started.

“I honestly did not know why Marcos suddenly decided to cite my ambush in justifying the declaration of martial law when he made his public statement on September 23. There was absolutely no need for it.”

Did he expect national amnesia to afflict Filipinos who know the truth? Are we expected to forget the press conference that he and and then Lt. Gen. Fidel Ramos called on Feb 22,1986 in the Ministry of National Defense when they withdrew their support for the dictator Ferdinand Marcos?In that life-and-death instance, he confessed that the attempt on his life was bogus. The following day, the headlines blared: “Enrile, Ramos lead ‘revolt’ against FM.” One of the subheads read: “1972 ambush fake—Enrile.”

This fact is further documented in various books written by foreign journalists who covered those perilous years. Time correspondent Sandra Burton, wrote in her book Impossible Dream(1989), “Seasoned observers believed from the start that the attack had been staged. Years later, as he was in the midst of his own revolt from the Marcos regime, Enrile would confirm those suspicions.”

Raymond Bonner of the New York Times interviewed Enrile twice in 1985. In his book Waltzing with a Dictator(1988) he wrote, “He was emphatic that the attack on him had not been staged, but in February 1986, after he had broken with Marcos and led the revolt that ousted the Philippine president, Enrile admitted that the attack on his car had been faked”.

Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Katherine Ellison also wrote in her 1988 book, Imelda,“(Enrile) revealed that he had narrowly escaped injury in a spectacular ambush of his car—an event he conceded in 1986 had been staged.”

In his attempt to leave an acceptable legacy for posterity and bequeath a Senate seat for junior, the nonagenarian is sanitizing his recollections instead of asking for absolution. Stem cell therapy can deter dementia but it cannot regenerate an innocent man.

And now the gullible electorate is being enticed to continue Enrile’s political dominion through the son, Jack. By his own narrative, Junior was not close to his father in his younger days. He recalled that as a child, he only watched a movie twice with his dad.The name was a burden for him as he was bullied and beaten up in school for being an Enrile. But today he is closer to his father. “Mas nag-uusap na kami ngayong ako’y nasa 50s, and he is in his 80s,” Jack said. His name is no longer a millstone. He is his father’s son after all.

Jack has his own intrigues to expunge. On December 30,1981, actor Alfie Anido, then the boyfriend of his sister Katrina was found dead. The tale turns murky but Jack was seenin the Anidos’ Bel-Air residence inside the room where the body of the matinee idol and a weeping Katrina were found. The official version, which has not been refuted to this day, was that Alfie shot himself.However, the rumor mill tagged Jackie (as he was known then) as responsible for Anido’s death. This conjecture gained traction and remains an urban legend till now. 

In his book, the elder Enrile said there was no doubt that Jack’s supposed role was the handiwork of Fabian Ver. “No doubt, the only purpose of those who spread that false rumor was to besmirch my family and destroy my reputation rather than to solve a crime for there was no crime at all,” Enrile said.

In the documentary, the young Enrile recalled responding to his sister’s call for help. He said he joined his father’s chief security aide, Gringo Honasan in Bel-Air.That’s when he found Anido dead from a gunshot wound to his head. He explained that his alleged connection in the supposed murder of Anido happened because “I was there. Even the family [of Anido] would say I had nothing to do with it.”

Another misdeed associated with father-and-son is the alleged rampant car smuggling in Port Irene. In 1995, the Cagayan Export Zone Authority (CEZA) was established through Republic Act 7922, authored by Cagayan native JPE. Among the vehicles being sold are Hummers, Porsches, Mercedes Benzes and BMWs, aside from the bestselling vans and minivans. CEZA CEO and administrator, Jose Mari Ponce, swears that the used-car trade was “very open and transparent”.

The flourishing buy-and-sell of secondhand cars in Port Irene  prodded the American Chamber of Commerce to submit a letter of concern to then Finance Secretary Margarito Teves. Despite EO156 issued in 2008, which prohibited such importations, smuggling continued. Enrile countered that CEZA is not covered by the prohibition because the importers pay the correct duties and taxes.Ford reportedly pulled out its manufacturing business to protest the nefarious activities in CEZA.

There’s a father-and-son story that comes to mind---

A father overheard his son pray: Dear God, make me the man my Dad is. Later, the father prayed: Dear God, Make me the man my son wants me to be.

We are being wooed to perpetuate the forty-years-running Enrile saga. Every night we should pray: Dear God, Make all who want our vote, be the men we want them to be.

citizenyfeedback@gmail.com

LEAH NAVARRO DOES NOT REPRESENT THE URBAN POOR

First, there was KontraDaya. Now, it’s Anakbayan. Both are part of the ultra-leftist coalition of Bayan and the Makabayan Coalition. These groups have waged an all-out campaign to discredit all Party List aspirants not aligned with their Maoist agenda – including Black and White.

Unfortunately, people buy into their propaganda without bothering to check the facts.

Before its creation, the conveners and members of the Black and White Movement were veteran advocates of various social causes. Undeniably, our nominees do indeed stand for their sectors.

They say Leah Navarro cannot possibly represent the urban poor. In our application for accreditation, we never said she did. She represents women – a sector specifically defined by the Party List Law as marginalized and under represented. And, why not? Leah has supported women’s rights causes even before joining Black and White. She is an advocate for responsible parenthood and has actively opposed violence against women. She has represented Black and White at events and projects supportive of various women’s causes alongside fellow conveners Karen Tanada and Beth Yang.

We wonder why they never mention our second and third nominees because, like Leah, they represent their sectors.

Our second nominee is Marco Cabrera – a leader of our Black and White Youth chapter. This segment of the Black and White organization started in 2009 in the Camanava area where it has been actively involved in engaging the youth via community service projects and involvement in political issues, focusing on truth, accountability and good governance. Again, the youth is one sector specifically defined by the Party List Law as marginalized.

Our third nominee is Ka Jose Morales – a leader of our Black and White Katipunan – an urban poor group based in the Taytay-Antipolo area, which has been part of Black and White since its inception in 2005. A tireless campaigner for the rights of our impoverished, Ka Jose is a convener of AKKMA (Aksyon sa Kalamidad at Klima), Ugnayang Lakas ng mga Apektadong Pamilya sa Baybaying Ilog Pasig (ULAP) and the Urban Poor Alliance (UPALL). Definitely, the urban poor are marginalized.

While it is true that some of our conveners are now in the Executive branch of government, it does not change the fact that Black and White has been actively engaged in advancing the causes of sectors considered as marginalized – women, youth, and urban poor. If given the opportunity, we are committed to protect and advance our multi-sector interests through responsive legislation.

We appeal to everyone to check the facts before buying into these groups’ Maoist-communist propaganda. Let us not leave the Party List system in the hands of leftist extremists that are hell bent on blocking the daan na matuwid. -- END

THE PARTY LIST SYSTEM IS NOT EXCLUSIVE TO LEFTISTS

BnW Media Press Release

29 September 2012

A leftist, anti-Aquino administration group purporting to be a non-partisan citizen’s group named Kontra Daya has called on the Black and White Movement to withdraw its application for accreditation as a Regional Political Party participating in the 2013 Party List election. It claims our close alliance with President Aquino makes a mockery of the Party List system.

To Kontra Daya, which is led by Fr. Joe Dizon, a close associate of the Bayan coalition and Bayan Muna Party List, we have one simple question: With due respect to Sen. Manny Villar (and the NP, now in coalition with the LP for the upcoming elections), whom Bayan allies supported in the 2010 presidential election, if he had won – would Bayan Muna withdraw its participation in the 2013 Party List election?

For the record, ever since our inception in 2005, the Black and White Movement has always worked with the urban poor sector. They were with us in our mass actions against the excesses of the GMA regime. In fact, the lead convener of Black and White Katipunan (our Urban Poor cluster), Ka Jose Morales, is our third nominee.

For the record, we also have a very active and passionate youth group – the Black and White Youth Movement and one of its leaders, Marco Cabrera, is our second nominee.

For the record, many of our conveners – Karen Tanada, Elizabeth Yang, and Leah Navarro are prominent advocates of women’s rights and issues.  We have chosen Leah Navarro – our first nominee, to represent the women’s sector. Her current appointment as MTRCB board member ends on 30 September 2012 and does not conflict with this advocacy. She cannot be reappointed when our accreditation is approved.

These sectors – women, youth, and urban poor - are specifically identified by the Party List law as marginalized.  We have meticulously complied with the requirements for a Regional Political Party (NCR) participating in the Party List system. All of our nominees belong to the sectors being represented. And none of them are former politicians. None of them are associated with any business interest or political clan.

WE ARE QUALIFIED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PARTY LIST ELECTION.  And if elected, we are committed to sponsor and support legislation that will protect and advance the interests of the sectors we represent.

Contrary to what Kontra Daya thinks, you do not have to be a leftist to qualify in the Party List system and fight for the marginalized. - END

Encore: BnW & Operation Compassion Join Forces

The Black & White Movement and Operation Compassion joined forces in 2009 during Operation Tulong Bayan. Once again, in the spirit of Bayanihan, we are partnering to augment relief efforts in the wake of the Habagat.

We have received requests for aid through our chapters in Quezon City, Tondo, Valenzuela and Zambales.

We appeal to you for financial donations as it will be easier for our BnW Youth and OC volunteers to purchase ready to eat food, pack blankets and other necessities for distribution. Moreover, some areas within Metro Manila are still impassable to light vehicles.

We appeal to you for help that will be much appreciated by our countrymen in those affected regions.

Here are the details:

The Black & White Movement Inc.

Bank: Banco de Oro (BDO)

Account Number: 006478007634

BP Operation Compassion Inc.

Bank: Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI)

Account Number: 3321-0178-34

Contact Persons:

Philip Castillo - 0917-568-8443

Susan Cucio - 0917-843-3041

Twitter: @BnWMovement

Thank you for your kind attention and look forward to your positive responses.

The Chief Justice is a Public Servant

In case you missed it, this is our ad as it appeared in three broadsheets today. We were hoping the Chief Justice would have given the Filipino people straightforward answers about the non-disclosures in his SALN when he took the stand today. Sadly, we did not. After 40 days, Renato Corona continues to lead us in circles around the truth. It seems there is only desert, and no oasis in sight.

CORONA: CHEAP TRICKS

The true colors of Chief Justice Renato Corona have been exposed beyond the shadow of a doubt. Despite every effort to be liberal with the rules, giving him every opportunity to make a statement, his response was to try to manipulate the Senate and make fools of everyone in the impeachment trial.

Instead of being forthright he substituted the truth by maligning people who had no part in the case and no opportunity to defend themselves. At the end of all his drama was a cheap shot: to try to diminish Congress by attempting to put institutions in the dock.

One man is on trial; one man stands accused; and despite all his protestations that he would reveal all, to the bitter end he has resorted to sly trickery, by making a conditional waiver. That was a cheap trick.

He then tried a getaway in the grand GMA manner.

The die has been cast. The Senate has issued a just ultimatum. He must face his accusers, and face them without further prevarication.

Corona's Hypothetical SALN

Let's suppose that sometime last week, Chief Justice Renato Corona sat at his desk and filled out his SALN form. Let's imagine that before he began filling it out, he decided to provide all the required information fully, truthfully and to disclose it publicly. He, after all, claims to be an honest man.

Now, what would Corona's SALN contain if he listed all the assets he failed to declare in past disclosures which were subsequently revealed during his impeachment trial? What of the recently alleged US$10M deposits? Do those dollar accounts exist? Only Corona can tell.

This is what Renato Corona's SALN would encompass if it had all the information gleaned from the impeachment trial plus the alleged dollar accounts. Remember, this is NOT his current SALN. We haven't seen it. But, hope springs eternal:

Messages from Mario - Remembering Mario Taguiwalo

The Black & White Movement mourns the passing of our co-convener and Spirit Guide, Mario Taguiwalo. He was husband to illustrator Beulah Pedregosa Taguiwalo, father to Mark, Homer and Mike. He was our friend and mentor. We began to miss him some time ago, when his health issues needed his closer attention. We take comfort in knowing that his loving Beulah and Homer were with him as he joined Mark and Mike in heaven.

Mario served the Philippines as Under Secretary of Health during the Cory Aquino administration. He was a Liberal Party leader, and president of the National Institute for Policy Studies (NIPS). Mario was also a convener of pagbabago@pilipinas. He was a popular political consultant and forum facilitator - he was blessed with clear thinking, insightful counsel, and colorful wit.

Mario loved the movies, especially Philippine cinema - he co-wrote Oro, Plata, Mata with Joey Reyes, Peque Gallaga and Conchita Castillo. More movie credits may be found at IMDB. Mario loved good food, good company and cold beer.

To honor his memory, we have compiled some of his writings and email posts that inspired us:

1.  In regard to the CBCP and the Hello, Garci Scandal (co-written with Oscar Lagman):

A Plea for Pastoral Guidance

September 10, 2005

We humbly seek the pastoral guidance of our Bishops in resolving the political crisis facing President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo based on the CBCP’s pastoral letter of July 10, 2005, “Restoring Trust: A Plea for Moral Values in Philippine Politics”.

Our Bishops pointed out that “At the center of the crisis is the issue of moral value, particularly the issue of trust.” As President Macapagal-Arroyo has recently called for the nation to unite and move on, we ask our Bishops if the issue of moral value, particularly of trust, in the highest office of our government has been adequately addressed in accordance with their moral and religious guidance of our people.

Truth, Justice and The Common Good

Our Bishops said: “a just political and moral order is best promoted under the present circumstances by a clear and courageous preference for constitutional processes that flow from moral values and the natural law. Hence we also appeal to the people, especially their representatives and leaders, to discern their decisions not in terms of political loyalties but in the light of the Gospel values of truth, justice and the common good.”

Truth? Many of us have come to believe in the truth that the Garcillano tapes are authentic; that these tapes contained faithful recordings of actual conversations between President Macapagal-Arroyo and Comelec Commissioner Garcillano; and that these conversations can only be understood as involving electoral cheating. These tapes became known to the public in June 6, 2005 when Secretary Bunye presented copies of extracts to the national press. More than three months since these tapes surfaced and despite the harm its contents have caused to the nation’s political stability, no credible, authoritative or serious effort has been mounted officially by government to demonstrate that these tapes were fake, tampered or manipulated. Given the absence of serious effort by government to prove the tapes’ fraudulence despite considerable resources for, and tremendous benefits from, doing so, we can only conclude that this must be because the tapes were indeed authentic. We can only conclude that the voice captured in these tapes is Garcillano’s, because this explains best his disappearance. And if indeed the tapes were authentic and the President and Garcillano indeed talked as recorded, we can only conclude from what we heard that these talks were about electoral cheating.

Justice? Many of us have come to believe it is unjust that no official investigation was ever mounted to ascertain the authenticity of the tapes or to establish the truth behind its contents; that, on the contrary, the powers and resources of government have instead been used to mislead people and prevent the truth from being known; that the impeachment process in the House of Representatives was actively influenced to deny the people’s desire for a factual determination of possible betrayal of public trust by their president. An editorial of the Philippine Daily Inquirer notes: “The Constitution gives the House all of 60 session days to discuss and decide impeachment complaints. The justice committee finished its work in 14 days, 12 of which were wasted on debating anything and everything but the very serious charges made against the President, including cheating in and stealing the last presidential elections.” Many of us believe that the people’s demand for fair hearing and eventual justice concerning charges of electoral fraud by the highest official of the land was in fact denied by that same official.

The Common Good? Many Filipinos have come to believe that their president cannot be trusted; that she has already been widely unmasked, if as yet not convicted, as an electoral cheat; that she is now using her powers, not to advance the nation’s best interests, but primarily to appease those who can help her remain in office despite the loss of people’s trust. Many of us now believe that her continued stay in power in the face of her unjust avoidance of the truth concerning doubts as to her legitimacy as duly elected president can only be detrimental to the larger common good. Many of us also believe that uniting behind her discredited leadership will ultimately erode our people’s belief in the importance of legitimacy, truth and integrity in our highest national leaders to the grave peril of our future as a civilized and law-abiding society. 

Moral Accountability

Our Bishops said: “Political authority is accountable to the people. Those who govern have an obligation to answer to the governed.” (Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, 408) President Macapagal Arroyo has admitted and apologized for a “lapse in judgment” for calling a Comelec official. The admission further eroded the people’s trust on the already suspected electoral system and raised serious questions on the integrity of the elections. Beyond apology is accountability, indeed with forgiveness is justice. To restore trust would require a thorough, credible and independent process to examine the authenticity of the so-called Garcillano tapes, verify any possible betrayal of public trust and mete out due punishment on all those found guilty. Punishment should also be imposed on all those found guilty of corruption and illegal acts, such as jueteng and wire tapping. Moral accountability calls for radical reforms in various agencies of government to make them more responsive to the requirements of integrity as well as to the needs of the poor.”

Given the absence of a “thorough, credible and independent” investigation of the tapes and in the light of the House of Representatives’ refusal to provide a constitutional process “to verify any possible betrayal of public trust”, how can our president be made accountable to our people for a lapse she has publicly apologized for making and how might we grant the forgiveness that she had sought based on justice? How can we even move ahead with punishing the guilty and undertaking reforms when the president, chief executive and commander-in-chief has not been held accountable for her own transgressions?

Effective Governance

Our Bishops said: “Public authority, in order to promote the common good, requires also the authority to be effective in attaining that end.” (Pacem in Terris, ch IV). Together with competence, personal integrity is one of the most necessary requirements of a leader… we would ask the President to discern deeply to what extent she might have contributed to the erosion of effective governance and whether the erosion is so severe as to be irreversible. In her heart, she has to make the necessary decision for the sake of the country.”

Two months have passed since our Bishops issued this pastoral letter and the President publicly welcomed its guidance saying she would study it closely and adhere to its advice. Within that period, she has indicated that the economy is more important than the just and truthful resolution of this crisis. Within that period, no Truth Commission was organized.  Within that period, Garcillano disappeared. Within that period, the House of Representative stopped the impeachment charges from being heard and tried.  Within that period, we see no effort to establish the truth, to refute the charges of cheating contained in the tapes based on their merits. How should the people now regard the effectiveness of our nation’s governance under President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo? Should we then unite behind such a president and move on as she asks?

Two months of words, actions and events offer abundant evidence for our Bishops to determine if their plea for moral values in Philippine politics has indeed been heard by those in power and if our highest leaders are now worthy of the trust we all seek to be restored. We thus seek their moral guidance for our future actions as Filipino citizens.

2. On the Black & White Movement:

Principles of Common Action for Truth, Accountability, and Reforms

WHEN we take a stand on moral grounds, we stand for ourselves on the basis of our deepest beliefs and highest values.  We have no control over the motives of those who choose to stand by us. We hope that all those who stand with us share our moral purpose. Our only assurance of this is when individuals formed together as a moral community take a stand as one.

We have stood for the Truth; we have fought for the Light. We do so for principle, for country, as our conscience and faith require us to do.  We respect all those who take a stand with us at such a vital time. Yet we acknowledge we cannot be certain that they all share our moral purpose.

This uncertainty increases the risks of obscuring the clarity of our moral vision as we seek the Truth by raising the Light to dispel the darkness of official obstruction and lies. Thus, we must set the principles that guide common action with others willing to work with us on various issues.          

This is not a numbers game. This is not a power game. This is not a game, period. This is about fighting lies with the truth; sweeping aside the reign of greed with an upsurge of idealism; discarding self-serving use of power that define traditional politics to be replaced by a reformed political culture that serves the nation’s common interests first.

We, therefore, adopt these principles as our guide to common actions with others at this time:

• We are bound by our common quest for truth, accountability, and reforms. There are those among us who call for the resignation, impeachment or even ouster of GMA. We respect the right of individuals or groups to make such calls. However, no one individual or group can speak for the whole or claim all of us pursuing the common quest as supporting any specific action on GMA.
• We have no intention, pretension or ambition to build a united front embracing all political and ideological positions for either tactical or strategic purposes. We encourage groups to organize their own activities that they believe will contribute to our common quest. And we encourage them to join others in common activities that do not compromise their own principles.
• We will not stop other groups and individuals, including even those who do not share our principles, from attending our assemblies. We will, however, regulate the people who speak in our gatherings, to ensure that no speaker will violate the principles defined here.
• We do not advocate, and in fact disapprove of, the violent overthrow of government, or the use of unlawful means to pursue our goals, or support of a military take-over in any form. We will not allow any one to use our activities as a forum for making public calls we do not advocate, and in fact, disapprove.
• We regard the use of our activities for personal political ambitions or advancement of hidden political agenda as among the self-serving practices of traditional politics that we reject. We will thus refuse any group and individual to use our gatherings for such opportunistic ends. Prominence in our activities will highlight attention on the religious, the youth, and other sectors whose voices have not yet been heard.
• We do not control when and how GMA will go or who and what will replace her if and when she does go. It is the people who will decide. Any statement on our part about post-GMA scenarios can easily be twisted as proof of a conspiracy to subvert the people’s will. In fighting a regime that has imposed itself against the democratic will of the people, we shall not make a similar imposition. Thus, we shall decline to comment on any post-GMA scenario as such comments do not serve the people’s demands for truth, accountability and reforms.

The scandals that outrage us are perpetrated by a government that has been captured by the greedy and corrupt in our political system, exemplified by a President who is evil. As we seek the truth about these scandals and demand accountability for crimes, we shall exercise our democratic rights and engage our democratic institutions. We refuse to sweep away the democratic order we so painfully won from a dictator in our effort against another President who hides the truth to avoid its righteous consequences.

From this outrage against scandals will emerge the power of a united people reclaiming national redemption. This power will energize our democratic institutions anew and re-dedicate them to the service of the truth, accountability and reforms. This power is emerging, growing and becoming compelling because individuals and groups are reacting in disgust to the greed of the powerful, to the cowardice of the well-connected, and the smugness of the comfortable. And as they reject what they see around them as unfaithful of their essential decency and fairness, they assert their common ideals and aspirations.

This is not a time for compromise. This is a time to stake out and build on what is right. We will embrace those who publicly repent past transgressions against the people, who surrender their personal ambitions in favor of serving our people, who will learn from the citizenry instead of pandering to their weaknesses. But this will not be an act of accommodation but a process of conversion. We do not lessen our commitment to our principles by accepting the less than fully righteous, rather we affirm those principles by our common effort to continuously work for righteousness.

 We are the youth.

 We are the educators.

 We are the religious.

We are business, big and small.

We are professionals.

We are workers.

We are the poor.

We are civil society.

We are of Metro-Manila, rest of Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao.

We are Filipinos committed to genuine change, not only of leaders and our institutions, but, most of all, to change in all of us as individuals and citizens.

And it begins, with each of us committing to this stand.

Fight for the truth! Use the light to fight the darkness! Do not depend on more lies to fight other lies! Lies are innumerable but the truth is only one! Principle is fought for with the power of one! The struggle for the truth sets us free, one individual at a time.

3. On the Dictator, Ferdinand Marcos, and Martial Law:

Opening spiel for "1081 - Rakrakan Para sa Kalayaan", 21 September 2003

"Good evening, you lucky Filipinos, living in freedom and democracy today, free to do great things or stupid things of your choice, enjoying democracy even for the desperate. We are indeed lucky Filipinos.

We live in terrible times. Life is hard and it hardly seems to get better. Money is short and hope is even more scarce.

Yet it might be raining troubles today, but there was a time when we were in the midst of a flood of problems. It might seem like nothing works for us these days, but there was a time when everything worked against us. It might seem that our government cannot be trusted these days, but there was a time when our government was really out to get us. It might seem that our police and military cannot seem to do right these days, but there was a time when they were terribly efficient in doing wrong.

Yes, my dear lucky Filipinos, there was a time, more than thirty years ago, when we were not so lucky, when a shitload of really heavy, bad things descended upon our beautiful country. There was a time when our government did not only fail us, but really oppressed, attacked, and hounded us.

So let me ask all of us here today to shout with me - Never Again! Let us shout really loud so that those intending to be future dictators can hear us - Never Again!

There was a time when we were a nation of 80 million cowards and one son-of-a-bitch dictator. But, mga pare at mare, Never Again!

There was a time when a Japanese tourist told us that we are a" rucky" people because we have a President who robs us and a First Lady who robs us even more. But, my friends, Never Again!

There was a time when our sisters were raped, our brothers murdered, our fathers imprisoned, our mothers did not stop crying, and we ourselves were paralyzed by fear. But mga kababayan ko, Never Again!

There was time when soldiers cut the the long hair of young men against their will. But for those among us who love their hair long, we say, Never Again!

There was time when the brains of a Science High student got scattered on the streets by an exploding pillbox. Those of us who still have our brains, we cry, Never Again!

There was time when we were immobilized by threat, when we did not know what to believe, when we thought that fear, ignorance and intimidation would never end. But now we know, Never Again!

Finally, there was a time we could hardly muster the courage to protest, when we could hardly find the strength to be outraged, when we thought each of us were alone against the terrible machinery of oppression. But now we are sure, Never Again!

Thank you.

4. On Gloria Macapagal Arroyo:

The Roots of An Immoral Presidency

I have been trying to understand what moral compass this woman used to get to the Presidency as it is crucial to understand what guide she applies in her political decisions. Here is my rough and dirty reconstruction of the immoral foundations of this never elected president.

1. Fact in the real world: GMA becomes successor president because ERAP's corruption creates a public outrage strong enough to force his resignation. Private moral lesson to GMA: It was not ERAP's corruption that was wrong. It was not even the public outrage to corruption. It was only the strength of the public demonstration of this outrage. GMA's application of the lesson is therefore to manage corruption as a communications matter not a key foundation of substantive governance practice. Corruption is fine as long as one can get away with it.
2. Fact in the real world: GMA gets declared winner of 2004 elections despite having cheated. Private moral lesson to GMA: People afraid of an FPJ win will accept even a flawed GMA win. Cheating is fine as long as it is not so blatant to be found out and it prevents an outcome that many powerful people did not really like.
3. Fact in the real world: GMA continues as president despite credible evidence shown to the public of her cheating in the last elections. Private moral lesson for GMA: Truth does not matter. Public outrage is unimportant if they do not march in the streets. Anyway, what's their alternative? Legitimacy is being in position. Only strength counts and as long as those wanting her out are not strong enough, life will go on for most people. Why change?

We have here an intelligent woman who has learned from her rise to and continued stay in power that:

1. It is not personal honesty that is important; it is only public perceptions that matter and these can be manufactured.
2.  It is not the authentic will of the electorate that matters; it is only the manufactured appearance of an electoral victory that is acceptable to powerful people.
3.  It is not the truth about a president's legitimacy to govern that matters; it is only the strength or force behind such truth that counts.

How long do you think our government and nation can last with a president, commander-in-chief, and top executive who does not care about personal honesty, only about the dangers of being found out; does not respect the true will of the people and ignores the truth, only bows to the force or strength behind that will and the truth? How long can we survive as a peaceful and civilized nation with our highest official that is immune to basic standards of honesty, respect for the people's authentic will and, most of all, adherence to the truth? The longer GMA stays in power after her illegitimacy to govern had been unmasked, the weaker is the case for her to even change or improve the way she governs. Why be honest when you can get away with corruption? Why follow the people's will when you can just cheat them? Why respect the truth when you can get away with ignoring it? It is clear that GMA is conscience-proof and only understands the force of numbers on the streets or in Congress or the firepower threatening her. As long as these superior arguments are not arrayed against her, she will continue and she may soon add another lesson into her personal manual of immorality: Filipinos do not have any moral backbone so why should their President have one? It would be great if enough Filipinos can teach this woman something new.